Moto GP Racer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Stuck in Morman Hell w/ my Ex
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
Feedback Score: 59 reviews
well after my cup of joe and a good morning read, i am ready to do some work, but before i go off to do that.
the ride articles are always the same...over the pond they have WAY more variety than we do in all aspects of riding gear. so most of their stuff is cool to read about, but unless you are willing to wait the rediculious amounts of time to get some of these products we have to go with what we can find.
so this comes to my next little soap box speach: WHY cant our mags do these types of reasearch projects? i remeber there was ONE that was good..it was a helmet review, it was SOOOO good that the mag lost a few of their vendors due to the results..NOW that is reporting!!! but the problem is they are far and few between, which limits the competive market between companies and then lowers the possibility for setting standards for protective equipment. (also these reports put common standards such as DOT and Snell under the microscope as well)
anyone have the link to that atricle? cause i am in the market for a new helmet, and wouldnt mind revisiting.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience
Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.
Last edited by BrowningBuck; 07-28-2008 at 09:40 AM.