Honda CBR 600RR Forum banner

Are Hummers truly the evil vehicles Environmentalists make them out to be?

  • Yes

    Votes: 25 37.3%
  • No

    Votes: 22 32.8%
  • I could care less! Stop wasting my time!

    Votes: 20 29.9%

  • Total voters
    67
1 - 20 of 56 Posts
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
Ok, since I have recently bought a Hummer H3 and started frequenting related forums, this topic has become of interest to me. I've had relatively few negative comments about my hummer, but I have noticed even owning an H3 has put me under a certain stereotype. Hopefully this thread wont get out of hand, my intent is to have a friendly debate on the topic. I know this can be a sensitive topic, so lets try to be respectful!

PLEASE DONT GET OUT OF HAND. I DON"T WANT TO SEE THIS THREAD SHUT DOWN!

So in my best coffee talk voice I say "Discuss amongst yourselves...."

Just to show off the opposing side of the story, here is a link....

http://www.blogsnotbombs.com/hummerhome.htm
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,066 Posts
I want to know why Toyota gets a pass because they have the Prius. In case any forgot, they also have the LandCruiser and its Lexus counter part, the 4 runner, the RX330... Tons of big gas guzzling vehicles and one little Hybrid. But Ford and GM who are producing decent, normal looking hybrids get no credit. Ford has the Escape SUV in a hybrid which was sold out for 2 years, 2 years ago!!! I havent been to a Ford dealer recently, but thats pretty damn good. Im sure there is still a waiting list. GM has the new pick up truck hybrid coming. Ah-nold is testing a hybrid version H2 as we speak.


The H3 is fine. So is the H1. The problem is that people just see a big car from the H1 and the poor milage the H2 gets and assume that the H3 is the same thing, when it is cleary not and neither is the H1. The gas powered H1s ok I can see, I think they are stupid too, but the Disel powered H1s are fine other than just being massive. Diesel, from what I have been told and researched produces less Carbon dioxide, you know that little guy that enviornmentalists whine about causing "global warming" but it produces soot which can be harmful if you have a constant exposure. Take your pick. Gas vs Deisel is not that easy of a choice. However, diesel can be ultra efficiant as I watched Jeremy Clarkson do a 425+ mile trip on a single tank of disel in a new A8. Some of the new diesel MBs can be go 625+ miles.

The biggest problem you have is that the name "Hummer" is attached to the car. And eco-terrorists dont really care or do any research. They just want to blow stuff up and create more pollution than if they left the place alone. I know that there was a Hummer dealer in Cali that got torched and the amount of smog and pollution cause from the burning paint, rubber and plastic cause more pollution than all the Hummer trucks in that dealership combined over the life time of the vehicles.
 
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Well, I am not strictly talking about H3's, but Hummer's in general. And to play devils advocate here, someone could argue that buying an H3 is helping to keep the Hummer brand alive, thus helping to keep the H2's on the road....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,824 Posts
IMO there are worse vehicles out there like the exotic cars...they are EPA rated at like 6-9mpg city which as we all know you almost never see the mpg the EPA rates vehicles at
 
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
We need some debate here! Surely someone hates hummers....I want to hear both sides of the story here.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,066 Posts
crotch_rocket_pilot said:
Well, I am not strictly talking about H3's, but Hummer's in general. And to play devils advocate here, someone could argue that buying an H3 is helping to keep the Hummer brand alive, thus helping to keep the H2's on the road....
To them I say they can argue all they want, this is still America and if I want to buy an H2 then Im going to buy an H2. H2s have been dropping off the map for quite a while. A car company will only keep a vehicle around if it sells and makes a profit or hits a certain demographic that isnt served by another vehicle they make or someone else makes. H2s are nothing more than reskined Suburbans. H3s are just SUV bodies on a Chevy Colorado chasis, I think... They didnt dump $$$$ into the development of these cars. Anyone who has ever been in an H2 knows this.

Also I dont think that Hummer is going under time soon since both the H2 and the H3 are nothing more than rebadged GM vehicles. Both have been designed and built under the ownership of GM and I dont think that they are folding anytime soon.
 
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
Sorry, I just like a healthy debate...and I would like to hear from some people who dislike them. When my stepmother heard I had one, she thought it was an evil thing I had done. She's a diehard democrat, and really opposes them.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,495 Posts
i have an h2. i love it. sometimes i kinda wish i had bought the h2 sut... but the good thing about the h2 (non-sut) is that you can fold down the rear seats and almost make a bedroom back there (if you get the idea). black on black with full tint. i tow my bikes to the track with it, take it to tahoe, big bear, and mammoth during boarding season, take a bunch of friends out somewhere, super comfortable for long trips (laguna, etc). people get out of way cuz it looks menacing on the street. it eats gas like crazy... but i put the cheapest 87 i can find... so it almost works out. in L.A., they are a dime a dozen as are all suvs... so no one really seems to give a damn. with all the high performance, high hp cars coming out nowadays... you could make an argument with any new high performance auto. most people seem to like it among my family and friends. once they get in it... they feel super safe and feel like they can see everything on the road. my next one will be either be another h2 (sut this time) or the new range rover sport (supercharged one).

hummer used to be word with a happy ending... now you can drive one. go figure.

cheers... nick - mri
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,161 Posts
Great subject, I think "tree huggers" who complain about large vehicles should be required to abstain from meat and any other animal products as livestock produce more carbon dioxide than cars.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,066 Posts
See there are 4 people that have voted yes, but arent willing to defend their positions. They just click and run.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,093 Posts
hummer used to be word with a happy ending... now you can drive one. go figure.
LOL, that's a good one.

Hey, what's the gas mileage on the H3? It's got to be pretty good. I was looking at the specs, and I was kinda surprised at the power output. 220hp, 225ft-lbs. That's less than my Honda Pilot, which anyone who knows Honda's would say "wow, something with less power than a Honda, that's surprising." (I mean no offense by that, the H3 is actaully very nice.) Anyway, my Pilot usually gets around 18mpg, and I'd say for an SUV, that's pretty decent. I don't really care if there are cars out there with super low gas mileage, I just wouldn't want to drive one, because it would cost a fortune.

:edit: I guess the Hummer is just designed to be more low-end torquey (torquey?) power. ("Me fail English... that unpossible.") When I checked the specs I noticed that the Hummer reaches it's 225 ft.-lbs. at like 2800 RPM while the Honda doesn't reach it's 240 ft-lbs. until 4500 RPM.
 
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #13
BDiddy said:
See there are 4 people that have voted yes, but arent willing to defend their positions. They just click and run.
I've noticed that...why cant we get some arguements from the other side?


Comb said:
LOL, that's a good one.

Hey, what's the gas mileage on the H3? It's got to be pretty good. I was looking at the specs, and I was kinda surprised at the power output. 220hp, 225ft-lbs. That's less than my Honda Pilot, which anyone who knows Honda's would say "wow, something with less power than a Honda, that's surprising." (I mean no offense by that, the H3 is actaully very nice.) Anyway, my Pilot usually gets around 18mpg, and I'd say for an SUV, that's pretty decent. I don't really care if there are cars out there with super low gas mileage, I just wouldn't want to drive one, because it would cost a fortune.
Lack of power has been a big complaint among H3 owners. It has awesome offroad capability but its definitely not a racecar. I'm getting about 17mpg. I think they went with the smaller engine to get better gas mileage. The H3 has shot hummer sales through the roof, they are selling them like crazy right now.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,093 Posts
Lack of power has been a big complaint among H3 owners.
I'm surprised they don't offer optional engines like Jeep and Dodge tend to do. Oh well, just throw a supercharger on there, that'll make it more powerful (and kill the gas mileage I guess).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,066 Posts
What GM did was take the new I6 cyl from the colorado p/u truck and lop off a cyl. It seems that they lopped off the magic HP cyl though because the Colorado p/u has quite a bit more power than the H3. I think someone ran the H3 at an 18 second q mile or a 16 sec q mile and like a 8 or 10 second 0-60.

Personally I wouldnt buy the H3 unless it came with at least the I6 motor. Preferably the V8 or a super charged I6 wouldnt be bad either. I think it looks great, but the utter sluggishness is just unacceptable to me. I was pretty psyched about it. I think it looks great and is a great idea just not fully realized yet.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
584 Posts
First I just want to say that I dont have a problem with people buying/driving whatever they want, it is a free country after all. I just dont see a NEED for these massive beasts on the road. Why does anyone need an H1? Offroading is one thing, I happen to enjoy it, but how many people drop $50k-150K on a new truck, then go beat the crap out of it on a trail? Not many, I think people buy them for some image that they think these beasts project. You can apply that theory to our bikes, sport cars, etc. I think the overused term is poser.

The H1 gets 8-10 mpg, H2 gets 10-13, H3 13-17, SUVs from Toyota, Nissan etc. arent any better. In a time when we are sending 19 year old kids to die over oil (you can tell me we are "liberating" Iraq all you want) I find it a bit irresponsible. Kind of reminds me of those commercials a while ago where they were saying that if you buy drugs you are funding "terrorists", well who do you think all that gas money is going to?

As far as the environmental arguments, I have one thing to say. The earth was here long before we got here, going to be here long after we "liberate" eachother off the face of the planet :)

just my $.02
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,093 Posts
BDiddy said:
What GM did was take the new I6 cyl from the colorado p/u truck and lop off a cyl. It seems that they lopped off the magic HP cyl though because the Colorado p/u has quite a bit more power than the H3. I think someone ran the H3 at an 18 second q mile or a 16 sec q mile and like a 8 or 10 second 0-60.

Personally I wouldnt buy the H3 unless it came with at least the I6 motor. Preferably the V8 or a super charged I6 wouldnt be bad either. I think it looks great, but the utter sluggishness is just unacceptable to me. I was pretty psyched about it. I think it looks great and is a great idea just not fully realized yet.
The H3 has a V6 engine.
 
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #18
I'll take a stab... (See disclaimer at the end)

Are Hummers truly the evil vehicles Environmentalists make them out to be?

I personally think that it's a soccer mom trend. Just the other day I heard a soccer mom comment on her recently purchased new H3 at a check stand in Yosemite. She was bragging about her new Hummer to complete strangers. It doesn't get any worse than that. H2 and H3 are a literally a joke. I mean don't get me wrong, they do get you around, but they are the laughing stock of the SUV family. GM keeps re-engineering the parts that break, but they should face it, it's not a Hummer. It's a cheap replica for posers (no offence to guys who own one) with an "I own a Hummer" attitude. One of the most ugly vehicles in history has got to be an H2 canary yellow with 24's on it.
Someone who actually needs a Hummer will buy a H1. Someone who wants to pretend that they need a Hummer will buy a H2 or H3. H2's and H3's were developed without the guts of the real Hummer for a reason, they had considered making the H2 tough like the H1, but realized that they could get just as much money for the H2 with Chevy Blazer running gear and the Trailblazer steering column. So why not save money and just buy the Blazer or the Trailblazer? Simple// poseriffic! Just like the Porsche Boxer (old one,) it may not perform like a Porsche, but hey it's a Porsche.

Get a bunch of soccer moms on a Ford Excursion or H2 kick and you have a movement... A genuine, gas guzzling, "I'm off to the supermarket by myself (good thing I own a Suburban with a 10" lift)" movement.

I actually have a family problem because my older sister (single w/ 3 kids) refused to take the company Suburban (96 for 10 grand) because it was not the new body style (2000+ for 25 grand+) So now, my sister does not talk to my mother, and my mother can't see her grandkids because of a selfish soccer mom who's life long dream is shattered because she can't have the latest and greatest Suburban. Talk about obsessive.

But, yeah it's a movement and taking it in a different direction would be beneficial for our stay on earth, in the long run. You have to start somewhere. If you commute in a H2 then you should consider buying a second car strictly for commuting.



Disclaimer: This discussion is for playing devils advocate only. This site does not necessarily reflect the same gas hog bashing opinion as I do. I am only bashing gas hogs for sake of discussion. Please don't take anything I say personally. Personally, I drive a MR2 spyder and a Tacoma V6 (not much better gas mileage than a H3.)
 
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #19 (Edited)
blackvomit said:
I just dont see a NEED for these massive beasts on the road.

If NEED is your arguement, then anything you have that uses gas/petroleum and isnt a NEED is just as wasteful as a hummer. The entire recreational vehicle market is a waste of gas (Motorcycles, Boats,etc) for the most part. Take anything you have that is plastic that you use only for pleasure and toss it, you dont NEED it. The majority of things the average american owns he doesnt NEED. Unless you are one of the unaverage americans who happens to live in a cave, then I see picking on Hummer owners as being a little hypocritical....
 
1 - 20 of 56 Posts
Top