Honda CBR 600RR Forum banner
1 - 20 of 25 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
109 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hey, im trying to find a formula for calculating speeds of accidents from skid marks left on pavement. Im talking about a down'd bike here, sliding on its side. Pavement is a standard road mix, not ashfault(haha spelling?) with chunks of rocks and gravel in it. the bike will have slid on its left side, dragging the pegs and the stator cover mainly, little rubber contact with pavement. no frame sliders. no tumbling. scratch marks in pavement measured 155 ft +/-

so if anyone has some formulas for me that would rock, i know there are lots of different variables, so the numbers will not be really precise. Im just looking for close, like the insurance investigators use. that kind of thing.

i have a bit of data accessable from a local bike crash, and just wanted to come up with my own conclusion as to MPH traveled etc.

thanks for any ideas or input.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
797 Posts
oo sounds like you should read my physics textbook!

jk, sounds complicated, not sure i could help you with much, but you will probably need to know how much friction, length of skid.. maybe weight of bike.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,806 Posts
Ask a cop.

If anyone would know it would be them.
 

· Post Whore Extraordinaire
Joined
·
20,073 Posts
thats not possible..
too many variables...
tire type, condition of tire, fuel and passnger load... cmon now... thats just ridiculous. No forumula can do that, and if anyone tells u it can they better have LOTS of proof, that its been tested and works consistently, and whether is pavement or asphault, they all have different levels of grip depending on the mix of the compound and how worn the surface is... why do u think every now and then they resurface drag strips and race tracks...
cops can estimate speed by looking at skid marks, and estimating the weight of the car, but since ABS even thats become pretty damn hard to do also
 

· Registered
Joined
·
912 Posts
A

tek said:
Hey, im trying to find a formula for calculating speeds of accidents from skid marks left on pavement. Im talking about a down'd bike here, sliding on its side. Pavement is a standard road mix, not ashfault(haha spelling?) with chunks of rocks and gravel in it. the bike will have slid on its left side, dragging the pegs and the stator cover mainly, little rubber contact with pavement. no frame sliders. no tumbling. scratch marks in pavement measured 155 ft +/-

so if anyone has some formulas for me that would rock, i know there are lots of different variables, so the numbers will not be really precise. Im just looking for close, like the insurance investigators use. that kind of thing.

i have a bit of data accessable from a local bike crash, and just wanted to come up with my own conclusion as to MPH traveled etc.

thanks for any ideas or input.
This is from a test I found at this link: LINK

"
Police have used the formula
to estimate the speed s (in mph) at which a car was travelling if it skidded d feet. The parameter C is the coefficient of friction determined by the kind of road (concrete, asphalt, gravel, tar) and whether the road was wet or dry. The following are some values of C.



"

Don't know how true it is, but you can give it a shot to see if it gives reasonable results. Otherwise, here's my 2 cents of the physics:

The coefficient of friction of rubber against smooth pavement is 0.8. The Cf of steel on steel is 0.4. Knowing this, I'd take a wild guess that your bikes expensive bits sliding along the pavement would yield a Cf of about 0.5-0.6. THIS IS A GUESS! You would actually need to "experiment" to get a descent value.

1) Simple Newtonian physics yields this formula from a balance of forces:

ma = - (N.Cf + 0.5*Cd.rho*A*(v^2))

where:
m is the mass of the bike (170kg)
a is the average deceleration of your bike (?? - you want to find this, in m/s^2)
N is the normal force exerted by the ground on your bike = m.g (in Newtons, g is gravitational acceleration = 9.8m/s)
Cf is the coefficient of friction (approx 0.6 as stated above)
Cd is the coefficient of air resistance / drag (0.55 for our bike)
rho is the density of air (1.2kg/m^3)
A is the frontal / cross sectional area of the bike (in m^2, --> 1.8m^2 , for the direct frontal area I think)
v is the average velocity encountered during the skid (in m/s). Give a rough estimate. The second term in the RHS of the above equation should be small anyways.

NOTE: Again, this is only an estimate, as you would actually need to integrate the above function w.r.t time to get an accurate answer.

2) Linear equation of motion are as follows:
v^2 = u^2 + 2as
OR
v = u + at

where:
v is the final speed of your bike (in m/s. Zero, I presume. Although if its not, it won't make a difference)
u is the initial speed of your bike (in m/s, ?? - What you want to find)
a is the average deceleration of your bike (in m/s^2, found from Equation (1) above)
s is the distance that you skidded for (in metres)
t is the time that you skidded for (in seconds)

Hope this helps.
You can PM me if you need a hand with the numbers. I know I put in metric figures. Its what the rest of the world use... You should have no prob using imperial units, just convert the numbers I used. Else stick to metric and convert at the end.

TO THE REST OF YOU: This is the estimate that HE wanted. ESTIMATE DAMMIT!!!
 

· Post Whore Extraordinaire
Joined
·
20,073 Posts
ok, maybe i cant read... i didnt see the ESTIMATE in there... sorry.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,297 Posts
DenBoe said:
oo sounds like you should read my physics textbook!

jk, sounds complicated, not sure i could help you with much, but you will probably need to know how much friction, length of skid.. maybe weight of bike.
As you can see from a few of the formulas given, weight is not taken into account here, despite what you would think.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
912 Posts
mikespike2 said:
As you can see from a few of the formulas given, weight is not taken into account here, despite what you would think.
Dude, read again. Mass helps dictate acceleration in the form of the frictional force (Normal force / WEIGHT x Coefficient of friction = Mass x gravitational acceleration x Coefficient of friction) and body force (Mass x overall acceleration). i.e. what is in Equation (1) that I outlined.

The police formula thing is probably taken from a statistical analysis. I cannot think of any scientific wizardry that could produce such a simplistic model based on the multitude of variables involved in a crash.
 

· Post Whore Extraordinaire
Joined
·
20,073 Posts
for some reason i thought it said HP... damn...i wonder if im developing something?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,236 Posts
snikwad said:
for some reason i thought it said HP... damn...i wonder if im developing something?
Too many hours in front of the computer screen. Take a break for a day or two and all should return to normal. Don't worry... Your post count shouldn't be affected all that much. There must be a formula for that too. bawhhahahah
 

· Registered
2003 Honda CBR 600RR
Joined
·
6,927 Posts
nooooooooo!!!! not another Physics lesson! my head's spinning. LOL
 

· Get Jiggy with it
Joined
·
6,213 Posts
I would have to go with Raptors guess on this...... There has to be a thoery that police and investigators use to investigate accident scenes.

It's not impossible...you just have to talk to the right people to find out what formula is used.

Don't get me wrong, you might never guess the "exact" speed, but i'm sure you will get right in the ballpark.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
479 Posts
My guess is somewhere between 60 and 80 mph. This is not based on physics but rather my own personal experience.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
228 Posts
Well, I dont have the formula handy with me right now, since I'm at home, but I have a program at work that will calculate speed from the amount of skid left... BUT - it only works with straight SKID left from rubber tires on asphalt... it does not take into account metal skid, yaw, or other such things...

Simply put, if I remember correctly, it's like 45 miles per hour lost for every 115 ft of skid...and it goes up from there... now don't quote my exact numbers, that just what I kinda remember from an accident I worked a while back...

I'll get back to you with the program tomorrow morning (it's just an excel spreadsheet one of our recon guys did with the previously listed formula)

Again, it's not an exact number, but it'll get you close for the tire skid... care to provide any details? skid distance? gouge depth/length? total accident scene length? etc...


tek said:
Hey, im trying to find a formula for calculating speeds of accidents from skid marks left on pavement. Im talking about a down'd bike here, sliding on its side. Pavement is a standard road mix, not ashfault(haha spelling?) with chunks of rocks and gravel in it. the bike will have slid on its left side, dragging the pegs and the stator cover mainly, little rubber contact with pavement. no frame sliders. no tumbling. scratch marks in pavement measured 155 ft +/-

so if anyone has some formulas for me that would rock, i know there are lots of different variables, so the numbers will not be really precise. Im just looking for close, like the insurance investigators use. that kind of thing.

i have a bit of data accessable from a local bike crash, and just wanted to come up with my own conclusion as to MPH traveled etc.

thanks for any ideas or input.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
161 Posts
jbadd99 said:
Well, I dont have the formula handy with me right now, since I'm at home, but I have a program at work that will calculate speed from the amount of skid left... BUT - it only works with straight SKID left from rubber tires on asphalt... it does not take into account metal skid, yaw, or other such things...
My buddy has told me in the past that it can be done with vehicles slidding on the metal, for instance a cager that turns over, this should work also for a bike. He has been to all levels of traffic crash reconstruction school available. He is awesome at that stuff. He is the only one in our county that has this much training. Just my $.02
 

· Registered
Joined
·
992 Posts
Does the formula incorporate forces such as friction and gravity and stuff like air resistance? That would be one complicated formula if it did.

I really hate physics!! And I'm taking it right now :(
 
1 - 20 of 25 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top