Where's My HP?

Yes, DynoJet now makes an Eddy Current dyno, and their old dynos can be upgraded to an Eddy Current.
It is not B.S. at all, just many old DynoJet kool-aid drinkers refused to see the light. DynoJet did realize that the other system was better and quietly changed their tune.

What I stated holds true. An Eddy Current dyno - whether Factory or DynoJet (happy now, sookie?) will read lower than the old DynoJet B.S. system, period. Eddy Current systems flat read better and more accurate. Factory Pro was right, and DynoJet had to compensate. Stop drinking the DJ kool-aid once in a while, and get up to date information.
All the real tuners have upgraded to Eddy Current systems so they can tune properly.

Doesn't matter if it was run on a Factory (which all DJ pansies hate) or a DJ version Eddy Current, it is the same thing.

hahahaha yeah but how many people now, I mean seriously, how many people that map bikes run the OLD dyno, it ain't a recent thing, and to put load on the bike, and as bikes changed (coz load on carb'd bikes doesn't change jack really, carb and throttle are the same regardless on carb'd bike are they not?) so did Dynojet. I seriously doubt Dynojet chaged anything under pressure from Factory Pro, (bwaaaahahahha) but anyway. What I said was right and to this day, on their site you'll see why their dyno is better than 10 y/o dynojet models and the very first PC's compared to what they use. NO comparison to PCIII's or USB's and apparently, dynojet don't make eddy current dyno's, go read the site, they will tell you. LOL

But as I have pointed out in the past, in the grand scheme of things, FP are irrelevent in comparison to DJ, plain and simple. I just get pist when people make sweeping statements about how FP dyno's read lower than DJ's coz they aren't eddy current. Like YOU DID say. It just ain't true in most cases later than the jurassic period. LOL

"Really, sookie? DynoJet "don't make Eddy Current dyno's"?
I understand you are a few years behind up-to-date tuners, but have a gander here:
http://www.dynojet.com/motorcycle_d..._dyno/index.php
Shock!! Look at that!!! Maybe you should talk to a DJ rep more than once a decade.
Yes, DynoJet has an Eddy Current system as well as an upgrade kit to their old crap.
Yes, they measure lower. All GOOD tuners know this."

Are you on drugs dude? where did I say that dynojet didn't make eddy current dyno's? That was my argument against what you said in the freakin first place.

HURRROOOOOO????

No wonder you have troubles understanding what it's all about. Hahaha I said this:

"I just get pist when people make sweeping statements about how FP dyno's read lower than DJ's coz they aren't eddy current. Like YOU DID say!,"

Because you DID say that the FP's read lower coz DJ's are NOT eddy current, did you not? Oh man, I can't believe I had to point this out. LOL. And just to make sure you get it, you said this:

"Your bike was run on an Eddy Current dyno. The true HP numbers they give are more accurate than those of the typical DynoJet dynos.
Your bike is right in line with DynoJet numbers, as 90HP on an Eddy Current is ~103HP on a DynoJet, and 100 on EC is ~115HP on a DJ."

Once again, and no matter how much you try and spin it, you're full of it. Thanks

Birdman said:

....blah blah........dynojet don't make eddy current dyno's, go read the site, they will tell you. LOL

Click to expand...

Right there, moron. You can't even remember a few posts up with all the double talk and BS you spread around the web.
try keeping your stories in line every once in a while.
Yes, Eddy Current systems read lower than old DJ systems. It is a fact, DJ even knows and talks about it.
I'd have you try running the same bike back to back on an old DJ system and a new 250i system, but you're a small-time shop, not a real race tune shop. Not a good enough tuner to handle a load control Eddy Current system.
I had this very thing done at a local shop. They still have their old DJ system and just got a new one. We ran it on both, back to back.
The Eddy Current system read 11HP lower.
Yes, it is a fact, no matter how much smoke you continually try to blow up other's skirts, you are wrong. But that's par for your course all over the web.
you may be able to snow some, but not others.

Mate seriously you need to learn to read and comprehend what you read. Go read their (factory Pro's) site, coz again that is who I was talking about in response to your fact filled info on his dyno numbers.

In referecne to Factory Pro:
"on their site you'll see why their dyno is better than 10 y/o dynojet models and the very first PC's compared to what they use. NO comparison to PCIII's or USB's and apparently, dynojet don't make eddy current dyno's, go read the site, they will tell you. LOL "

Fill in the Blah blah's and it suddenly makes sense does it not? well, maybe not if you read "blah blah" out of that. THEY is FP doofus.

Did you read where I also said this? It was only my first comment to your wealth of knowledge. Hurroo??


"You guys really need to start reading more up to date websites and forgetting the absolute BS that Factory Pro gon with. Seriously, ANY Dynojet dyno that has a brake on it, or runs tuning link etc IS an eddy current dyno. "

As for my tuning etc, LOL You're the expert, I can't argue with that, I've got nuthin'. Hahaha

Tell you what, sook. you've been caught with your pants down in another spreading of crap, but I'll just let you keep on thinking you're some kind of moto-God here. Those that have been snowed by you can continue to think you actually know what you're talking about, while the rest of us on all the other boards you've shown your hand to will know.
You're wrong, many people know you're wrong. You refuse to ever accept any other input from real tuners and refuse to ever accept the many times you've been wrong.
It is just flat out proven fact that EC dynos read a lower number than old DJ systems. ALL good tuners know this, you never will.
Spin it all you'd like, but you were caught out. Again. I know you have a hard time with the English language above the 6th grade level, but you'll get it eventually.
Keep on screwing up, as it's so much fun to watch and call you on.

Hey, since you think you're Colin's best friend and hang out with him all the time, tell us which WSBK team he's going to be with next year?

hey BDA116... do you realise you just said exactly the same thing as birdman said?

"It is just flat out proven fact that EC dynos read a lower number than old DJ systems. ALL good tuners know this, you never will."

old being the important word here. you haven't specified how old, birdman (who actually speaks with the companies) has already said that its the REALLY old ones.

P.S. it's interesting to read that you keep changing what you say while avoiding the main point of birdmans argument (which he keeps repeating) until you eventually say the same thing as he says and claim it as your own thought. are you a politician by any chance?

P.P.S. when you say things to the effect of 'gearing changes the dyno reading', it really puts a hole in your arguments. it shows you don't have a clue what you are saying. go do some research and learn a thing or two, then talk with people who have.

bye bye.

hahahah bda, as odd just pointed out, you're a dill, you will not show me ONE person that has proven me wrong about mapping etc on a forum, except for dills like you that keep spewing shiit, without really having any idea what so ever. You get you and 2 of your bum buddies on a forum that think the same stupid crap, and yeah, you'd prove (to yourself) that Dan Kyle is wrong, Ten Kate is wrong, who ever you don't like etc etc) PLEASE show me where I said, that my dyno and other Dynojet dyno's are NOT eddy current. Oh man, you surely cannot be this stupid without trying really hard. Go re-read the thread again and once you wake up to yourself and see you've just made a tool of yourself, reply again and I'll accept your apology. haha Or, you can just keep wandering through fantasy land, up to you.


BTW, going to Sepang in September to hang with CE and then to PI, I'll tell him you said Hi. Bwaaaaaaaahahahahaha