all that work they did to it and it's still at the bottom :lol2:

you have to figure all these new BS claims by the manufacturers are with ram air and probably at low temps. remember how the new r1 was supposed to have 180hp? try 151 at the wheels, less than the cbr1000rr :lol2:umar456 said:what ever happen to 124 hp???
hey can you link me to where the R1 tested at 150?? :lol2:luckydevil said:you have to figure all these new BS claims by the manufacturers are with ram air and probably at low temps. remember how the new r1 was supposed to have 180hp? try 151 at the wheels, less than the cbr1000rr :lol2:umar456 said:what ever happen to 124 hp???
http://www.r1-forum.com/forums/showthread.php?s=4b6addf3488012dae62ee3832f5e9df7&threadid=70276RR|Suki said:hey can you link me to where the R1 tested at 150?? :lol2:
http://www.1000rr.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=84RedBlur said:what does the 1000RR dyno at?
You do you know that they mean 180HP at the crank, right? That'd equate to about 151 rwhp. Others have dynoed the R1 at 160 rwhp.luckydevil said:you have to figure all these new BS claims by the manufacturers are with ram air and probably at low temps. remember how the new r1 was supposed to have 180hp? try 151 at the wheels, less than the cbr1000rr :lol2:umar456 said:what ever happen to 124 hp???
yeah, i know the difference. a 12% loss of the original crank hp# to get 151 at the wheels would make that bike about 172 at the crank. i just think it is extremely shady of the manufacturers to make these huge crank claims and then add in some ram air numbers to inflate them even more.integrate said:You do you know that they mean 180HP at the crank, right? That'd equate to about 151 rwhp. Others have dynoed the R1 at 160 rwhp.
The 103 rwhp sounds just about right for 124 CRANK HP.
btw, with the more RPMs, the GSX-R600 can use gearing to their advantage.